Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204.īRIEF EXPLANATION OF LIBRARY RESEARCH FORMAT Background of Study In this section, you need to begin your presentation by explaining the gap between expectations and reality in the field of education you are studying, both theoretical and practical gaps underlying the problem(s) to be studied. There’s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Kendall’s advanced theory of atatistics, vol. Objective of Study Based on the above research question, this research is intended to obtain theįollowing objective. Referring to the aformentioned problem statements, one research question isįormulated as follows: “How does the total physical response method develop the students’ performance. Problem of Study In order to develop one’s ability of spoken English language. According to Richard, Platt and Weber (1985, p. Speaking and listening is the important skills in communicative language performance. Ten (10) pages maximum does not include either the FIRST PART or the FINAL PART. ONLY 8-10 PAGES NOTE: A proposal exceeding 10 pages (minimum 8 pages) in the MAIN PART will be returned to be condensed. METHOD OF STUDY AND THEORETICAL ORIENTATIONĢ.1 Method of Study. ii Table of Contents.iii List of Appendices (if any). 2014 Acknowledged by, Head/Secretary of Study program STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION, FKIP UNSYIAH RESEARCH PROPOSAL CONSULTATION CONTROL FORM ACADEMIC ADVISOR (Dosen Wali) Student NameĬonsultation Stage (Guidance and supervisory Services)Īcademic Advisor. STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION SYIAH KUALA UNIVERSITY DARUSSALAM-BANDA ACEH 2014 margin bawah 3 cm Seminar Proposal margin kiri 4 cmġ0 ketukan Time new roman 12 pt Bold typeīy Syardani M. THE AFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHOD IN TEACHING SPOKEN ENGLISH FOR YOUNG LEARNERS Mashasiswa yang mendaftarkan proposal pada Prodi harus sudah on line-kan mata kuliah “SKRIPSI”. The approved seminar proposal is then submitted to the Head of Study Program for further action (issuance of Surat Penunjukan Pembimbing). The student is given an opportunity to amend his/her proposal, and the improved proposal can then be directly submitted to the reviewer/s to be reviewed again (however the proposal is no longer required to be presented at a seminar again, unless there are changes, which affects the substance of the proposal). The reviewer/s may write important notes for changes and improvements in the box.

If the result of a seminar indicates that the proposal is FEASIBLE or NOT FEASIBLE for a skripsi research, the reviewer will sign and check (√) either one of the boxes provided in the Consent Form. The appointed reviewer/s may automatically become the concerned student’s supervisor/s. The Head of Study Program will appoint 3-4 lecturers as the reviewer/s of the proposal, excluding the student’s academic advisor and 1 moderator. Therefore, the academic advisor should seriously check and/or make sure whether the format is correct or not in accordance with the standard format. The proposal will be returned to the student if it does not follow the standard format. The approved proposal is then submitted / administered to the Office of Study Program for scheduling of a seminar. When the academic advisor approves the dratf proposal, he/she will sign the approval form (Consultation Control Form).

The academic advisor will discuss the result of his/her review with the student concerned in order to advise on necessary changes recommended to be made. In addition to the content, the draft proposal should include a table of contents and list references. The draft proposal should be covered with a front page. A student will submit a draft proposal to his/her academic advisor to be reviewed. SUBMISSION OF THE SKRIPSI PROPOSAL The mechanism of the proposal submission is as follows.

Judul skripsi broadcasting kualitatif